<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Blown Mortgage - Latest Comments in What is the technical definition of ?depression??</title><link>http://blownmortgage.disqus.com/</link><description>Mortgage and finance with a sarcastic bent</description><atom:link href="https://blownmortgage.disqus.com/what_is_the_technical_definition_of_depression/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 02:19:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: What is the technical definition of ?depression??</title><link>http://www.blownmortgage.com/what-is-the-technical-definition-of-%e2%80%9cdepression%e2%80%9d#comment-3951152</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Collateral, I wasn't pointing the finger at you.  Constantine didn't fully upload the article.  He added more.  You're cool, my finger pointing was at HIM!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Don</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 02:19:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What is the technical definition of ?depression??</title><link>http://www.blownmortgage.com/what-is-the-technical-definition-of-%e2%80%9cdepression%e2%80%9d#comment-3936010</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i think i wasn't clear in my comment. i was trying to say you were right and I agree with your point. it probably read like i was making fun of you. apologies.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CollateralDamage</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:49:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What is the technical definition of ?depression??</title><link>http://www.blownmortgage.com/what-is-the-technical-definition-of-%e2%80%9cdepression%e2%80%9d#comment-3929568</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Um, you want to ADD those.  It equals 29.3 percent.  No we weren't in a "recession", we were in DEPRESSION.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;HELLO, S &amp;amp; P was off 89% from it's high and unemployment was somewhere between 25 and 33 percent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"So there really is no technical definition for a depression." Uh, yes there is, just like there is a techincal definition of a recession, which is two contiguous quarters of contracting GDP.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Riduclous comment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Don</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:50:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What is the technical definition of ?depression??</title><link>http://www.blownmortgage.com/what-is-the-technical-definition-of-%e2%80%9cdepression%e2%80%9d#comment-3916209</link><description>&lt;p&gt;technically, you're right. :D&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CollateralDamage</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:33:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What is the technical definition of ?depression??</title><link>http://www.blownmortgage.com/what-is-the-technical-definition-of-%e2%80%9cdepression%e2%80%9d#comment-3916075</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Technically, a depression occurs when the economy contracts 10%.  In the early 30's, we contracted 30%, thus a Great Depression.  This country has seen many depressions, but the one in the 30's was oviously the worst.  I think we contracted 4 or 5% in the recession of '82 or '83.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We'll be lucky if we don't go further than that this time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Don</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:28:27 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>