<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Blown Mortgage - Latest Comments in The Stock Market</title><link>http://blownmortgage.disqus.com/</link><description>Mortgage and finance with a sarcastic bent</description><atom:link href="https://blownmortgage.disqus.com/the_stock_market/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:02:28 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Stock Market</title><link>http://blownmortgage.com/2008/11/21/the-stock-market/#comment-5375448</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Predicting a bottom is always a tough call... but then the same can be said about the upside.  I remember a debate some years ago about the DOW breaking 10,000... no one believe it could happen, but that's history now.  Guess that's why I like pennys, there's always the opportunity to find a new company (which is our niche) and run with it before the masses jump on board... &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">penny stocks</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:02:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Stock Market</title><link>http://blownmortgage.com/2008/11/21/the-stock-market/#comment-3970277</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Regarding PE ratios referenced in the link-  it is useless to use analysts' 2009 PROJECTED earnings to measure PE ratios and whether such stocks are a bargain.  Analysts are notoriously bad.  The S &amp;amp; P 500 earnings estimates for 2009 are currently around $98.    That would be a 70% increase from 2008...in a deep recession.  And an 11.9 PE ratio is NOT a historically low level- it's more like a normal level, if you take out the last decade.  In the 1973-74 and 81-82 recessions, it bottomed around a PE of 6&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:08:34 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>