<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Blown Mortgage - Latest Comments in Lehman may mark down $61 billion worth of mortgage assets</title><link>http://blownmortgage.disqus.com/</link><description>Mortgage and finance with a sarcastic bent</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:14:08 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Lehman may mark down $61 billion worth of mortgage assets</title><link>http://blownmortgage.com/2008/08/19/lehman-may-mark-down-61-billion-worth-of-mortgage-assets/#comment-1705694</link><description>there are going to be all sorts of worms that come out from under this&lt;br&gt;rock.  you can't put the genie back in the bottle, as they say..</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">morganb</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:14:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lehman may mark down $61 billion worth of mortgage assets</title><link>http://blownmortgage.com/2008/08/19/lehman-may-mark-down-61-billion-worth-of-mortgage-assets/#comment-1679205</link><description>Well, those Boston loans should  be interesting.  The way mortgages in MA and the rest of New England is really screwy.  The last mortgage banker I worked for had a lot of problems with our Boston office.  There were lots of problems because they where notorious for funding high cost loans back there and it was really a pain to sell those loans.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Don</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 02:47:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lehman may mark down $61 billion worth of mortgage assets</title><link>http://blownmortgage.com/2008/08/19/lehman-may-mark-down-61-billion-worth-of-mortgage-assets/#comment-1656625</link><description>My partners and I are eagerly anticipating the coming months..... we're raising $20MM to purchase defaulted first mortgages in Mass and New Hampshire and we hope we are able to negotiate big enough discounts to warrant us getting involved. Should be interesting to see how this next period pans out!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yours in the starting blocks,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Richard Dale-Mesaros :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Chief Deal Weaver&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.BlackWidowNetwork.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.BlackWidowNetwork.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richard Dale-Mesaros</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:21:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lehman may mark down $61 billion worth of mortgage assets</title><link>http://blownmortgage.com/2008/08/19/lehman-may-mark-down-61-billion-worth-of-mortgage-assets/#comment-1654469</link><description>Lehman (dba Aurora Loan Svcs) was doing the absolute goofiest, riskiest most-prone-to-fraud loans there were in 2005-2006:  100CLTV NO Ratios, etc... We can never tell from the outside how much of that risk was successfully pawned off on other investors and/or MI companies, but a 20% write-down on that kind of freaky Alt-A product seems woefully inadequate.  I know of an own-occ 80LTV SISA on a California condo closed in 2004.  Purchase price of $275k.  Lehman now has a "BPO" (broker price opinion) on the unit for $109,000.  Lehman is now claiming fraud on the basis of borrower's bogus stated income.  Their correspondent is being billed - after accrued interest, legal fees, etc... - $180,000. That's an 80% loss on a loan where the borrower put 20% down.    Other situations are even worse: if they bought in 2006, if they put zero down, etc...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A 25% drop in property value can be a 50-60% loss on a 100% loan.  I suspect Lehman is worse off than this recent write-down would suggest.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fielding Mellish</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:39:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lehman may mark down $61 billion worth of mortgage assets</title><link>http://blownmortgage.com/2008/08/19/lehman-may-mark-down-61-billion-worth-of-mortgage-assets/#comment-1651557</link><description>wachovia and wamu are definitely going down... as are many other banks&lt;br&gt;- but wall street i-banks i only see lehman in the cross hairs...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">morganb</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:37:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lehman may mark down $61 billion worth of mortgage assets</title><link>http://blownmortgage.com/2008/08/19/lehman-may-mark-down-61-billion-worth-of-mortgage-assets/#comment-1651530</link><description>Wachovia is going down also.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Doug</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:35:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lehman may mark down $61 billion worth of mortgage assets</title><link>http://blownmortgage.com/2008/08/19/lehman-may-mark-down-61-billion-worth-of-mortgage-assets/#comment-1650449</link><description>I am doubling down on that bet and putting the rest of my chips on (not an I-bank, but big all the same) Washington Mutual too.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill Rice</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:30:07 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>